A jurisdiction-aware, temporally versioned legal knowledge and services platform. Every answer carries the authority it rests on — the statute, the version, the date it was in force and the court that read it — and says so when there is none.
Free to search the law, the constitutions and the attorney directory. Create an account for research, matters and AI — on web today, with desktop, iOS and Android to follow.
Three layers, one foundation
Most legal software picks one. Separating them is why a research tool cannot book you a lawyer and a practice-management tool cannot tell you what the law was in 2018. Here they sit on the same jurisdiction graph.
The world's jurisdictions as a graph, the law attached to them, and every version kept — so "what was the law in 2018?" has an answer.
Practitioners by jurisdiction, practice area, language, price and availability — with transparent filters rather than a mysterious ranking.
Matters, documents, deadlines and workflows, with the firm's own knowledge as a private brain nobody else's AI can reach.
The Atlas
Treaties and sanctions, trafficking and exonerations, inheritance and patient rights — each a lens over the same jurisdictions, concepts and sources, so the domains agree with each other. Every record shows where it came from; every gap is shown, not hidden.
Courts
Two products on one court model: a courtroom for the people taking part, and court-authorised public access for everyone else. A livestream, a recording, an AI transcript and the official record are four different things, and every page says which one you are looking at.
A virtual courtroom for judges, lawyers, parties and witnesses. Seats, not links: each person checks in, waits, and is admitted by the court, with only the audio and video their role allows.
Court-authorised public access. The public watches a broadcast from a separate gallery — never the courtroom — and the court can cut it at any moment while the hearing carries on.
The court's console: calendars, hearings, seats, public access within the jurisdiction's rules, and the full audit log. Media carried by Telenaas.
Why you can rely on it
An AI that cannot show you the statute it read is asking you to take its word. This one produces an evidence chain, and refuses rather than guesses.
Question
How much notice must I give an employee in Ontario?
Statute
Employment Standards Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 41, s. 57
The notice of termination required is at least one week if the employee's period of employment is less than one year…
Interpreted by
A decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal
Verdict
Supported by primary authority in this jurisdiction
When the retrieved authority does not support an answer, you get "insufficient authority" and what was found — never a plausible paragraph with a citation that does not exist.
An empty result says the platform holds no registered source for that jurisdiction. Those are opposite statements and they never render the same.
A document you may not read is never handed to a model, however relevant its embedding. Ethical walls are applied when the query is built.
Machine translations are labelled and cannot be quoted as the statute. The authoritative text and an unofficial rendering are different things.
LawyerStudio
Matters, clients, documents, deadlines, research, billing and trust accounting — with the firm's own knowledge as a private brain that never touches anybody else's.
Matters
Facts, issues, authorities, evidence
Clients
Intake, conflicts, engagement
Documents
OCR, extraction, immutable originals
Deadlines
Computed, with the rule that produced them
Case Builder
A matter compiler, not a text editor
Research
Projects, sources, citations, drafts
AI Agents
Scoped tools, audited, human-approved
Automation
Triggers, conditions, approvals
Billing
Time, fixed fees, disbursements
Trust accounting
Client money kept separate
Communications
Video, voice, SMS, secure chat
Firm brain
Precedents and templates, privately
Data sovereignty
Matter files are privileged, government advice is sometimes classified, and some jurisdictions forbid the data leaving at all. So every organisation declares where its authoritative records live: our shared database, a dedicated one, or your own Postgres that we cannot reach.
The public legal corpus — constitutions, statutes, reported cases — stays in the platform database in every mode. It is not yours to hold, and replicating the world's law into every private node would help nobody.
Your records live in the shared platform database, scoped to your organisation.
A platform-managed database isolated to you alone, in the region you choose.
Your own Postgres, on your own infrastructure. We hold the connection credentials encrypted and nothing else.
Connected
Video, voice and SMS; maps; translation into any language; payments and client accounts; storage; alerting; identity verification — every one over an API and an MCP tool, and every one that is switched off says so rather than guessing.
Pricing
Searching the law, reading a constitution and finding a lawyer cost nothing, and always will. Access to the law is the point of the platform, not the funnel.
Free
always
From $149
per practitioner, per month
Talk to us
firm, enterprise, government
Ask what the law is where you are. You will get the provision, its source, the date it came into force — and the practitioners who work in exactly that area.